Page 1 of 1

Fighter inactivity

PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2015 11:52 pm
by hawdrigoh
Ok my body is almost ready to post some rankings. One question I came across though is how long a fighter should be inactive for to be ineligible for rankings?

Is 1 year reasonable?

Re: Fighter inactivity

PostPosted: Thu Dec 24, 2015 2:07 am
by Indra
I have the same question. But to be honest, there is only 1 fighter in the rankings I came up with that would be affected by this.

Any guesses as to who it is? :wink:

Re: Fighter inactivity

PostPosted: Thu Dec 24, 2015 1:22 pm
by hawdrigoh
Indra wrote:I have the same question. But to be honest, there is only 1 fighter in the rankings I came up with that would be affected by this.

Any guesses as to who it is? :wink:


Bears are nasty.

Re: Fighter inactivity

PostPosted: Fri Dec 25, 2015 1:20 pm
by Mohawk Jesus
I say 1 year. That seems to be the industry standard...if there is such a thing lol.

Re: Fighter inactivity

PostPosted: Sun Dec 27, 2015 12:00 pm
by J D
yup, one year.

Re: Fighter inactivity

PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 9:42 pm
by Indra
hawdrigoh wrote:
Indra wrote:I have the same question. But to be honest, there is only 1 fighter in the rankings I came up with that would be affected by this.

Any guesses as to who it is? :wink:


Bears are nasty.


Check out the big brain on Brad!

Re: Fighter inactivity

PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2016 12:21 pm
by Indra
Needing a consensus on this: If a fighter has not fought in over a year, but has a fight scheduled, should they be eligible for rankings?

My vote would be no, because there is no guarantee they will be making the fight until it actually happens.

But, what does everyone else think?

Re: Fighter inactivity

PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2016 5:02 pm
by philphan
Indra wrote:Needing a consensus on this: If a fighter has not fought in over a year, but has a fight scheduled, should they be eligible for rankings?

My vote would be no, because there is no guarantee they will be making the fight until it actually happens.

But, what does everyone else think?

I think that sounds fair. I'm gonna have to have someone else let me know who crosses that line. :mrgreen: