Page 1 of 3

MMATH De-bunked Again?? * Spoiler *

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:47 pm
by Jojo
Stann > Leben > Wandy > Stann

Wandy > Bisping > Stann > Leben > Wandy

Funny, Bisping is the only one to not get KTFO by one of the other three.

Re: MMATH Denbunked Again?? * Spoiler *

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:49 pm
by RebelSaki
C'mon jojo. MMAth was never bunked to begin with.

Re: MMATH Denbunked Again?? * Spoiler *

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 10:01 pm
by vampxx24
well... i think many could argue, leben isnt >wand, wand just used a HORRIBLE gameplan in that fight and got ko'd......i would have wand winning 8/10.... maybe 7/10............. ranks up there with forrest trying to strike with silva.. ok maybe not that bad.

Re: MMATH Denbunked Again?? * Spoiler *

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 10:11 pm
by Jojo
vampxx24 wrote:well... i think many could argue, leben isnt >wand, wand just used a HORRIBLE gameplan in that fight and got ko'd......i would have wand winning 8/10.... maybe 7/10............. ranks up there with forrest trying to strike with silva.. ok maybe not that bad.


Just going by MMath bro. Wand lost to Leben in this equation so Leben > Wand.

Re: MMATH De-bunked Again?? * Spoiler *

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 10:21 pm
by seb
you missed one

le>franklin>wandy
wandy>le>franklin

Re: MMATH De-bunked Again?? * Spoiler *

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 10:24 pm
by Jojo
seb wrote:you missed one

le>franklin>wandy
wandy>le>franklin


Yes. Good one.

Re: MMATH De-bunked Again?? * Spoiler *

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 10:29 pm
by judojake
Wandy in general always debunks MMAth.

Wand>Jardine>Chuck>Wand

Wand>Le>Franklin>Chuck>Wand

Re: MMATH De-bunked Again?? * Spoiler *

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 10:43 pm
by nmesniper
Yup.We need to do mma science next time...

Re: MMATH De-bunked Again?? * Spoiler *

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 10:44 pm
by Jojo
judojake wrote:Wandy in general always debunks MMAth.

Wand>Jardine>Chuck>Wand

Wand>Le>Franklin>Chuck>Wand


Wandy does seem to be always be in the equation :lol:

Re: MMATH De-bunked Again?? * Spoiler *

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 10:49 pm
by thenoje
LHW Wand > MW Wand.

Re: MMATH De-bunked Again?? * Spoiler *

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 10:59 pm
by BrdrOkm69
Wand>Sakuraba>Vitor>Wand

How far back into his career does this go?

Re: MMATH De-bunked Again?? * Spoiler *

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 11:04 pm
by Jojo
Only one equation makes sense.

Vitor > Wandy > Bisping.

Vitor and Wand should rematch @ 205.

Re: MMATH De-bunked Again?? * Spoiler *

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 11:35 pm
by PBells
So basically, if you're fighting Wandy and you've beaten someone who's beaten him, you're fucked.

Re: MMATH De-bunked Again?? * Spoiler *

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 11:53 pm
by Jojo
PsychoBells wrote:So basically, if you're fighting Wandy and you've beaten someone who's beaten him, you're fucked.


Pretty much. Or if you have beaten Wandy, and are facing someone who has lost him, you are also fucked :lol:

Re: MMATH De-bunked Again?? * Spoiler *

PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:01 am
by beachboysob
Image