Advertisement
OMGLASERGUNPEWPEW wrote:agonzalez1 wrote:Yeah, someone pointed out the AEI on myspace to me and gave me a census beaureau source that doesn't call any thing obama has as a tax increase but a tax "plan".
so sources of information are quickly become very unreliable.
i agree that iraq must be ended. I think it will be very soon. Because of the surge. Obama never supported the war (which is good or bad) but for sure didn't support the surge (which is bad or bad).
Iraq war will be ended when USA finish their oil robbing business.
Nuclear weapons?!Gimme a break.USA has it,Russia has it.Why the fuck Iran shouldn't have it for protection?So they can get robbed like Iraq did.
I guess Iran is next and after that Venezuela (because Chavez didn't bend over and he's sitting on all that oil).
That's pure tyranny if you ask me.
Jinzo wrote:
Oh My Goodness, thats from the AEI that's not a great source for references.
Anyhow, I like Mccain my only thing against him is his stance on the war in Iraq. War on Terror and War on Iraq should be distinguished. We do not need to be in Iraq who are we after? Osama Bin Laden cmon US is spending only 88 billion dollars in Afganstan while we're spending over 700 billion dollars in Iraq. Cmon does that make any sense? That's a lot of our tax payers money, yet we complain about the democrat tax increase(NOT that i'm for it) that pales in comparision to what we're going to pay through Inflation & the so called war on terror (Iraq).
That's why I'm all for Ron Paul fix what matters, fix the problems that would cost us the most, then fix the smaller problems.
agonzalez1 wrote:OMGLASERGUNPEWPEW wrote:agonzalez1 wrote:Yeah, someone pointed out the AEI on myspace to me and gave me a census beaureau source that doesn't call any thing obama has as a tax increase but a tax "plan".
so sources of information are quickly become very unreliable.
i agree that iraq must be ended. I think it will be very soon. Because of the surge. Obama never supported the war (which is good or bad) but for sure didn't support the surge (which is bad or bad).
Iraq war will be ended when USA finish their oil robbing business.
Nuclear weapons?!Gimme a break.USA has it,Russia has it.Why the fuck Iran shouldn't have it for protection?So they can get robbed like Iraq did.
I guess Iran is next and after that Venezuela (because Chavez didn't bend over and he's sitting on all that oil).
That's pure tyranny if you ask me.
I hear you..but like i said...iraq will be over soon. Obama now wants WOMEN to register for Selective Services....
-i guess he doesn't believe in their right to choose after all?
-why have women in a potential draft situation if he's about ending wars?
wilfred wrote:We all have to make sacrifices, Ryan. Like the story of Jesus Christ. I'm sure the Roman soldiers wanted to hang out at the Pantheon and stare at tits all day, but they knew they had a duty to kill Jesus.
agonzalez1 wrote:Jinzo wrote:
Oh My Goodness, thats from the AEI that's not a great source for references.
Anyhow, I like Mccain my only thing against him is his stance on the war in Iraq. War on Terror and War on Iraq should be distinguished. We do not need to be in Iraq who are we after? Osama Bin Laden cmon US is spending only 88 billion dollars in Afganstan while we're spending over 700 billion dollars in Iraq. Cmon does that make any sense? That's a lot of our tax payers money, yet we complain about the democrat tax increase(NOT that i'm for it) that pales in comparision to what we're going to pay through Inflation & the so called war on terror (Iraq).
That's why I'm all for Ron Paul fix what matters, fix the problems that would cost us the most, then fix the smaller problems.
Here's the other source:
You do have to takes things with a grain of salt however...it all looks fine and dandy...but...
How is it that you can give a tax "cut" when the bottom 50-60 percent pays no income taxes? Obama's is a wealth-distribution plan...there will be tax increases. That's why the chart is Tax "Plan". So sure, you see that taxes go up for the top EARNERS - because income is to be earned, not distributed - but the bottom claim of a cut is misleading at best, a Lie at worst. Thanks for the info though, I appreciate it.
Jinzo wrote:Obama doesn't know what he wants. He doesn't have a clear agenda, that is kind of scary if he's President. He doesn't even know what to do about the economy. I admit Mccain's plan isn't sound but at least he's clear on it, we gotta have leadership.
wilfred wrote:We all have to make sacrifices, Ryan. Like the story of Jesus Christ. I'm sure the Roman soldiers wanted to hang out at the Pantheon and stare at tits all day, but they knew they had a duty to kill Jesus.
matttoma3 wrote:THEEBURNZ wrote:yeah were all going to be dead in 4 years anyways so who cares
is that a reference to the mayan calender?
December 21, 2012.
End of the world as we know it.
Stand-up_Philosopher wrote:Neither.
I want Ron Paul to be president.
chadjohn24 wrote:
How many voters out there are really this stupid?
wilfred wrote:We all have to make sacrifices, Ryan. Like the story of Jesus Christ. I'm sure the Roman soldiers wanted to hang out at the Pantheon and stare at tits all day, but they knew they had a duty to kill Jesus.
detfilteg wrote:Jinzo wrote:Obama doesn't know what he wants. He doesn't have a clear agenda, that is kind of scary if he's President. He doesn't even know what to do about the economy. I admit Mccain's plan isn't sound but at least he's clear on it, we gotta have leadership.
The fact that the current administration is buying stock of private banks should also be scary for you. Just because it is a plan does not mean it is a good one. Now the government is going to play an even bigger role in banking, so I do not expect things to get better anytime soon.
Jinzo wrote:detfilteg wrote:Jinzo wrote:Obama doesn't know what he wants. He doesn't have a clear agenda, that is kind of scary if he's President. He doesn't even know what to do about the economy. I admit Mccain's plan isn't sound but at least he's clear on it, we gotta have leadership.
The fact that the current administration is buying stock of private banks should also be scary for you. Just because it is a plan does not mean it is a good one. Now the government is going to play an even bigger role in banking, so I do not expect things to get better anytime soon.
Yes thanks for telling me something I already know. The fact is more democrats voted for that bail out plan. This plan wouldn't have passed if it wasn't for joint effort from the donkeys and the elephants. Bernake has called for this plan since he is the so called "expert" against the great depression. Having seen past history during 1929 when the government did nothing we had a crash. After the crash there was no money made available to the banks which worsen the situation. I guess he wanted to make this a solution. I don't know there's nothing we can do about it he is the renowned world economist. Actually the top 200 economist in the world. Do I like this plan NO, I hate paying more taxes but it is in the hands of Bernake and Paulson.
Anyhow You think having a demand side tax cut(if its a tax cut at all) brought by Obama is going to make us better off versus a supply side? I don't think so.
wilfred wrote:We all have to make sacrifices, Ryan. Like the story of Jesus Christ. I'm sure the Roman soldiers wanted to hang out at the Pantheon and stare at tits all day, but they knew they had a duty to kill Jesus.
detfilteg wrote:
Don't get me wrong I am not for either of the top two candidates, neither of them speak to me. All I am saying is that the way it is going right now it wouldn't matter if Jesus Christ himself was elected president this country is still gonna be in the shitter for a few years before it finally recovers. When it does the government is going to control not only the government's money but also most of it's citizen's money considering how much bank stock they can buy with almost a trillion dollars.
Advertisement