Advertisement
bruins2012 wrote:A distric attorney converting a misdemeanor to a felony after 2 prosecutorial agencies already said there was nothing there does not bode well for the Manhattan DA. How many times have you guys been told “the walls are closing in” only to be wrong and disappointed t8me and time again.
duvalfan wrote:bruins2012 wrote:A distric attorney converting a misdemeanor to a felony after 2 prosecutorial agencies already said there was nothing there does not bode well for the Manhattan DA. How many times have you guys been told “the walls are closing in” only to be wrong and disappointed t8me and time again.
Who told you that? Someone who has seen the charges? All 34 of them?![]()
The guy is fucked and his fake tough guy persona is going to crumble when he has to actually face reality for once in his life. If he lives that long.
bruins2012 wrote:duvalfan wrote:bruins2012 wrote:A distric attorney converting a misdemeanor to a felony after 2 prosecutorial agencies already said there was nothing there does not bode well for the Manhattan DA. How many times have you guys been told “the walls are closing in” only to be wrong and disappointed t8me and time again.
Who told you that? Someone who has seen the charges? All 34 of them?![]()
The guy is fucked and his fake tough guy persona is going to crumble when he has to actually face reality for once in his life. If he lives that long.
You’re actually the one who brought up the charges first, and stated how fucked he was, even though you don’t know what the charges are….
How many times have you posted over the years about how “the walls are closing in” only to be wrong time after time?
duvalfan wrote:bruins2012 wrote:duvalfan wrote:bruins2012 wrote:A distric attorney converting a misdemeanor to a felony after 2 prosecutorial agencies already said there was nothing there does not bode well for the Manhattan DA. How many times have you guys been told “the walls are closing in” only to be wrong and disappointed t8me and time again.
Who told you that? Someone who has seen the charges? All 34 of them?![]()
The guy is fucked and his fake tough guy persona is going to crumble when he has to actually face reality for once in his life. If he lives that long.
You’re actually the one who brought up the charges first, and stated how fucked he was, even though you don’t know what the charges are….
How many times have you posted over the years about how “the walls are closing in” only to be wrong time after time?
Do you think they’d vote to indict Trump of 34 charges who has a cult following behind him without being 100% confident in the evidence? Give your head a shake. You just don’t want to admit you’re wrong.
I brought it up because you seem so sure the case will be dismissed without knowing what you’re talking about.
duvalfan wrote:bruins2012 wrote:duvalfan wrote:bruins2012 wrote:A distric attorney converting a misdemeanor to a felony after 2 prosecutorial agencies already said there was nothing there does not bode well for the Manhattan DA. How many times have you guys been told “the walls are closing in” only to be wrong and disappointed t8me and time again.
Who told you that? Someone who has seen the charges? All 34 of them?![]()
The guy is fucked and his fake tough guy persona is going to crumble when he has to actually face reality for once in his life. If he lives that long.
You’re actually the one who brought up the charges first, and stated how fucked he was, even though you don’t know what the charges are….
How many times have you posted over the years about how “the walls are closing in” only to be wrong time after time?
Do you think they’d vote to indict Trump of 34 charges who has a cult following behind him without being 100% confident in the evidence? Give your head a shake. You just don’t want to admit you’re wrong.
I brought it up because you seem so sure the case will be dismissed without knowing what you’re talking about.
duvalfan wrote:You’ve already embarrassed yourself by thinking you’re smarter than the DA and the grand jury who have actually seen the evidence and what the 34 charges are
An expired misdemeanour? Are you actually going with that? Like I said before, you must feel so smart to have caught that and the DA and the grand jury missed it![]()
![]()
PainDog wrote:
duvalfan wrote:You’ve already embarrassed yourself by thinking you’re smarter than the DA and the grand jury who have actually seen the evidence and what the 34 charges are
An expired misdemeanour? Are you actually going with that? Like I said before, you must feel so smart to have caught that and the DA and the grand jury missed it![]()
![]()
ryotostpierre wrote:duvalfan wrote:You’ve already embarrassed yourself by thinking you’re smarter than the DA and the grand jury who have actually seen the evidence and what the 34 charges are
An expired misdemeanour? Are you actually going with that? Like I said before, you must feel so smart to have caught that and the DA and the grand jury missed it![]()
![]()
A grand jury is a low bar for intelligence...or anything really. Hence the "ham sandwich" cliche. I would imagine a DA who wants to make a name or gain some prestige is probably not bringing charges they already know will get tossed for being beyond the statute of limitations. Even if they were trumped up charges you'd at least want them to be something that gets you to the starting line if you're after the publicity or fulfilling some kind of campaign promise.
duvalfan wrote:ryotostpierre wrote:duvalfan wrote:You’ve already embarrassed yourself by thinking you’re smarter than the DA and the grand jury who have actually seen the evidence and what the 34 charges are
An expired misdemeanour? Are you actually going with that? Like I said before, you must feel so smart to have caught that and the DA and the grand jury missed it![]()
![]()
A grand jury is a low bar for intelligence...or anything really. Hence the "ham sandwich" cliche. I would imagine a DA who wants to make a name or gain some prestige is probably not bringing charges they already know will get tossed for being beyond the statute of limitations. Even if they were trumped up charges you'd at least want them to be something that gets you to the starting line if you're after the publicity or fulfilling some kind of campaign promise.
Great points. Agree that a grand jury isn’t necessarily smart but they have access to all of the evidence yet bruins thinks he has some info that they don’t![]()
Check what Bill Barr said
William Barr, the former attorney general in the Trump administration, said on Fox News Sunday that it would not be wise for Donald Trump to testify in the criminal case against the former president.
“I'm not his lawyer,” Barr said. “Generally, I think it's a bad idea to go on the stand and I think it's a particularly bad idea for Trump, because he lacks all self-control and it'd be very difficult to prepare him and keep him testifying in a prudent fashion.”
How can anyone want this guy to be president again? Someone without self control running the world
Advertisement