Advertisement
bruins2012 wrote:MurderfaceMMA wrote:Thank you President Trump for making the world safer.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/07/worl ... visit.html
Care to expand? It’s almost as if you have no idea what you are talking about ever.
You been wrong throughout this entire exchange and can’t even go into detail about Trump’s “agreement” with Kim and how Trump is “making us safer” with his “not some kind of pussy deal”.......
willmma wrote:bruins2012 wrote:MurderfaceMMA wrote:Thank you President Trump for making the world safer.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/07/worl ... visit.html
Care to expand? It’s almost as if you have no idea what you are talking about ever.
You been wrong throughout this entire exchange and can’t even go into detail about Trump’s “agreement” with Kim and how Trump is “making us safer” with his “not some kind of pussy deal”.......
According to murder:
Iran deal:
Country without nuclear weapons
NPT member in good standing
Most intrusive inspections ever
Reducing uranium stockpiles by 98%
Multinational agreement
[Pussy deal because Obama]
Korea:
Country with actual nuclear weapons
Photo Op in Singapore
Inspecting some test facility
[Make America Safe Again because Trump]
MurderfaceMMA wrote:bruins2012 wrote:MurderfaceMMA wrote:Thank you President Trump for making the world safer.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/07/worl ... visit.html
Care to expand? It’s almost as if you have no idea what you are talking about ever.
You been wrong throughout this entire exchange and can’t even go into detail about Trump’s “agreement” with Kim and how Trump is “making us safer” with his “not some kind of pussy deal”.......
See any missile tests recently?
bruins2012 wrote:MurderfaceMMA wrote:bruins2012 wrote:MurderfaceMMA wrote:Thank you President Trump for making the world safer.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/07/worl ... visit.html
Care to expand? It’s almost as if you have no idea what you are talking about ever.
You been wrong throughout this entire exchange and can’t even go into detail about Trump’s “agreement” with Kim and how Trump is “making us safer” with his “not some kind of pussy deal”.......
See any missile tests recently?
Look, Murder still can’t bring up any details from Trump and Kim’s No Pussy Deal Agreement.
Gee, I wonder why? And if your standard is that you can’t see any misses in the air or on TV then you are setting the bar very, very low.
So you can’t provide even the smallest amount of detail to an agreement which you stand behind and can’t provide any detail on how it’s Trump that “made the world safer” and not South Korea. You have proven yourself to know nothing about the situation in the past and now you are continuing to march down that same oath again.![]()
MurderfaceMMA wrote:willmma wrote:bruins2012 wrote:MurderfaceMMA wrote:Thank you President Trump for making the world safer.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/07/worl ... visit.html
Care to expand? It’s almost as if you have no idea what you are talking about ever.
You been wrong throughout this entire exchange and can’t even go into detail about Trump’s “agreement” with Kim and how Trump is “making us safer” with his “not some kind of pussy deal”.......
According to murder:
Iran deal:
Country without nuclear weapons
NPT member in good standing
Most intrusive inspections ever
Reducing uranium stockpiles by 98%
Multinational agreement
[Pussy deal because Obama]
Korea:
Country with actual nuclear weapons
Photo Op in Singapore
Inspecting some test facility
[Make America Safe Again because Trump]
No matter how many times you repeat that silly line, its not true. Clearly you have have no idea what the inspection process was.
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) has a number of significant flaws, such as a weak inspection and verification regime, an automatic sunset provision and failure to restrict Iran’s growing ballistic missile program.
Furthermore, it did nothing to hamper Tehran’s support for terrorism and insurgency. In fact, the up to $150 billion in Iranian assets the deal unfroze has probably helped underwrite the country’s recent military adventurism in Syria and elsewhere.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/ ... 589828002/
willmma wrote:
This is hogwash.
Your sources's source, the Debkafiles are a known biased and not honest, pro-Israeli anti Iranian site.
the IAEA, from the horses mouth, The International Atomic Energy Agency describes the transcontinental monitoring program it operates as the toughest and most technologically advanced inspections regime put in place to prevent a country from developing an atomic bomb. link
This site describes the deal more accurately
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... -nuclear-/
But even if we go with your source, and even if Dehqan was properly quoted, if you read your link it says that what he is talking about IS NOT IN THE DEAL. And the IAEA as well as several US Intelligence agencies have said that Iran is in compliance with the deal, so if he said that stuff, he's just playing to the base.
www.iaea.org wrote:The Additional Protocol is not a stand-alone agreement, but rather a protocol to a safeguards agreement that provides additional tools for verification. In particular, it significantly increases the IAEA’s ability to verify the peaceful use of all nuclear material in States with comprehensive safeguards agreements.
www.iaea.org wrote:Traditional methods of sampling and analysis can take three weeks or longer, mostly because of the time it takes to ship the sample from Iran to the IAEA’s laboratories in Austria. The IAEA already had plans to develop a tool for real-time monitoring of enrichment levels in gas centrifuge enrichment plants under IAEA safeguards, Aparo said. With the support of Member States, it has accelerated the development of the technology in light of the JCPOA requirement, he added ... The IAEA’s work in Iran will benefit from the very latest technology to ensure effective and efficient verification and monitoring, Aparo said.
MurderfaceMMA wrote:Now USAtoday is a rightwing source?![]()
That deal was a joke. Only some of their nuclear sites were under scrutiny, and like you said, the rest of them were off limits for up to 24 days after a request to inspect them and NONE of their military bases could be inspected, which could be used to hide weapons grade uranium and centrifuges.
https://www.google.com/amp/www.latimes. ... utType=amp
willmma wrote:MurderfaceMMA wrote:Now USAtoday is a rightwing source?![]()
That deal was a joke. Only some of their nuclear sites were under scrutiny, and like you said, the rest of them were off limits for up to 24 days after a request to inspect them and NONE of their military bases could be inspected, which could be used to hide weapons grade uranium and centrifuges.
https://www.google.com/amp/www.latimes. ... utType=amp
I didn't say some nuclear sites. I said all nuclear sites. I also said 24 days to access NON-NUCLEAR military sites.
I didn't say anything about the LA Times. I said this piece was an opinion piece that focused on two items. 1 that non nuclear sites need 24 day notice. But the big point he had is that the deal is so shaky Trump was able to withdraw from the deal.
Its like you don't even read
willmma wrote:https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/iran
"ALL NUCLEAR MATERIAL"
Hate Obama all you want
Hate Iran and Muslims all you want
It doesn't change the fact that this is the MOST RIGOROUS inspection program EVER.
I'm done with you.
MurderfaceMMA wrote:willmma wrote:https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/iran
"ALL NUCLEAR MATERIAL"
Hate Obama all you want
Hate Iran and Muslims all you want
It doesn't change the fact that this is the MOST RIGOROUS inspection program EVER.
I'm done with you.
There is nothing in your link that refutes the fact that most of their nuclear facilities arent subject to 24 hour a day inspections. Nice try though.![]()
I just proved you were wrong. The facts are right there for everyone to see. If you're done with me, it's only because you totally lost this debate. Do more research next time, instead of merely parroting the bullshit you heard from a leftwing politician.
willmma wrote:MurderfaceMMA wrote:willmma wrote:https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/iran
"ALL NUCLEAR MATERIAL"
Hate Obama all you want
Hate Iran and Muslims all you want
It doesn't change the fact that this is the MOST RIGOROUS inspection program EVER.
I'm done with you.
There is nothing in your link that refutes the fact that most of their nuclear facilities arent subject to 24 hour a day inspections. Nice try though.![]()
I just proved you were wrong. The facts are right there for everyone to see. If you're done with me, it's only because you totally lost this debate. Do more research next time, instead of merely parroting the bullshit you heard from a leftwing politician.
Iran's nuclear facilities: 17
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_f ... es_in_Iran
IAEA inspects 19
https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/iran
IAEA inspects ALL NUCLEAR MATERIAL
https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/iran
IAEA has 24/7 monitoring
https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/iran
IAEA inspects 3000 man days per year
https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/iran
ba-byeSpoiler:
Advertisement