"I mindlessly bought into the hype and now I'm mad."

by **TheAssassin** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:50 am

Discuss, people who will apparently "never watch Lombard again."

**Sponsor**

by **Lamer** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:56 am

Not really buying into hype to expect someone to crush the can that is Tim Boetsch.

by **DPino51** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:57 am

Lamer wrote:Not really buying into hype to expect someone to crush the can that is Tim Boetsch.

to put it simply, boestch is not a can.

by **Lamer** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:57 am

DPino51 wrote:
Lamer wrote:Not really buying into hype to expect someone to crush the can that is Tim Boetsch.

to put it simply, boestch is not a can.

Yeah he is.

by **perm85** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:58 am

I will watch him again but not pay to watch him and if he starts out anything like he did this time I will stop watching quick the only reason I watched the whole fight last time was I thought he had some kind of gameplan and was gonna explode in the third or something

by **DPino51** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:58 am

Lamer wrote:
DPino51 wrote:
Lamer wrote:Not really buying into hype to expect someone to crush the can that is Tim Boetsch.

to put it simply, boestch is not a can.

Yeah he is.

no he is not, but your wrong opinion is noted.

by **perm85** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:59 am

Lamer wrote:Not really buying into hype to expect someone to crush the can that is Tim Boetsch.

If boetsch is a can. than what is Lombard?

by **Lamer** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:59 am

perm85 wrote:I will watch him again but not pay to watch him and if he starts out anything like he did this time I will stop watching quick the only reason I watched the whole fight last time was I thought he had some kind of gameplan and was gonna explode in the third or something

Honestly, he should have just exploded. Tim Boetch's defense is about as bad as it comes in the UFC. Honestly, aside from Boetchs ability to get the shit kicked out of him and maybe his power, he's very, very poor.

by **Lamer** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:00 am

perm85 wrote:
Lamer wrote:Not really buying into hype to expect someone to crush the can that is Tim Boetsch.

If boetsch is a can. than what is Lombard?

Sub-can.

by **DPino51** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:01 am

Lamer wrote:
perm85 wrote:If boetsch is a can. than what is Lombard?

Sub-can.

..... um yea your still wrong.

by **polito** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:03 am

Lamer wrote:
perm85 wrote:
Lamer wrote:Not really buying into hype to expect someone to crush the can that is Tim Boetsch.

If boetsch is a can. than what is Lombard?

Sub-can.

shut up, that was as dumb as partying with "korean Zombies" plz. Lombard is a can. Boetsch is on a streak I believe. Since when are cans on a streak?

by **Lamer** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:04 am

DPino51 wrote:
Lamer wrote:
perm85 wrote:If boetsch is a can. than what is Lombard?

Sub-can.

..... um yea your still wrong.

How so? Like I'd love to hear your reasoning as to why Boetsch isn't a can, despite looking like shit in almost every fight. Honestly, his biggest win is over Okami, and he basically got shat on for 3 rounds, landed some wild ass power and then got a TKO....do you really think that shit works consistently at the highest levels?

by **Mikal** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:04 am

polito wrote:
Lamer wrote:
perm85 wrote:
Lamer wrote:Not really buying into hype to expect someone to crush the can that is Tim Boetsch.

If boetsch is a can. than what is Lombard?

Sub-can.

shut up, that was as dumb as partying with "korean Zombies" plz. Lombard is a can. Boetsch is on a streak I believe. Since when are cans on a streak?

Lombard was on a huge streak.

So technically, you're either saying Boetsch is still a can even though he is on a streak, or Lombard isn't a can because he was on a huge streak.

Either way you fucked up.

They're both cans, btw.

by **perm85** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:05 am

Lamer wrote:
perm85 wrote:I will watch him again but not pay to watch him and if he starts out anything like he did this time I will stop watching quick the only reason I watched the whole fight last time was I thought he had some kind of gameplan and was gonna explode in the third or something

Honestly, he should have just exploded. Tim Boetch's defense is about as bad as it comes in the UFC. Honestly, aside from Boetchs ability to get the shit kicked out of him and maybe his power, he's very, very poor.

he's very, very poor

it has nothing to do with how much money he has.

by **Lamer** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:07 am

polito wrote:
Lamer wrote:
perm85 wrote:
Lamer wrote:Not really buying into hype to expect someone to crush the can that is Tim Boetsch.

If boetsch is a can. than what is Lombard?

Sub-can.

shut up, that was as dumb as partying with "korean Zombies" plz. Lombard is a can. Boetsch is on a streak I believe. Since when are cans on a streak?

Since they get matched up against other bad fighters? Honestly. When has he fought someone good and looked impressive? Does he have any outstanding techniques? His striking is garbage, the dude can barely kick worth a shit. His double leg looks HS level at best, and his jiu jitsu is like purple belt shit.

Honestly, someone explain to me how getting shit on by Yushin Okami, than landing a haymaker makes you good?